Lyme disease isn't unknown in California

http://www.sfgate.com/health/article/Lyme-disease-isn-t-unknown-in-California-4367917.php


Lyme disease isn't unknown in California, and the San Francisco Chronicle tells why:


http://www.cdph.ca.gov/HealthInfo/discond/Documents/TickTestQandA.pdf  READ HERE 

0
inShare

Comments (0)

Larger | Smaller

Printable Version

Email This
Font

Many people think of ticks and Lyme disease as something we don't have to worry about in California. Not so, according to data from the state's Department of Public Health. There were 74 confirmed new cases of Lyme disease in California in 2011, the most recent year for which data are available. Forty percent of those were in the Bay Area, with 10, the state high, in Santa Clara County.

The western black-legged ticks - the ones that transmit the disease in California - are not fully grown in the spring. The size of a poppy seed, they can be tricky to spot among the wood and leaves on the ground where they live.

Lyme disease usually starts with an expanding, red rash near the site of the tick bite and flu-like symptoms one or two weeks after contact with the tick. At these early stages, Lyme disease can be successfully treated with antibiotics, but untreated, it can lead to arthritis and neurological damage.

If you discover a tick on your body, remove it immediately; laboratory studies show it can take 24 to 48 hours before an attached tick starts transmitting bacteria to the human it's feasting on. But the health department says it's not necessary to send the tick to a lab to be tested for Lyme disease. It's more important to watch for symptoms in the person who's been bitten. 

For more information: http://bit.ly/YuAChL

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/health/article/Lyme-disease-isn-t-unknown-in-California-4367917.php#ixzz2PfdTfbQ7

Alread

Minmom3

4:25 PM on March 19, 2013

Avoiding them isn't THAT hard - wear the serious DEET bug repellant. But, I wanted to say that what I've read says you DO want that tick tested, because it's FAR easier to get an accurate test on the tick, and then decide on treatment, early on, than it is to wait until you have an accurate test on the human. False negatives on humans are common before the 6 months (or so) mark, but it's easy to treat that early. Once it's past that time limit, and there are visible symptoms, then it's very hard to treat, and can take years of antibiotics. Not something to mess around with, and sending off that tick REALLY isn't that difficult. I went to vector control in downtown San Jose who gave me everything I needed to send it off.

 REPLY

 (1)

 (0)

POPULARITY: 1

 |  |  [Report A

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/health/article/Lyme-disease-isn-t-unknown-in-California-4367917.php#ixzz2PfeBW7T7